Say No To War With Iran: July 2008

Saturday, July 26, 2008

Ex-Mossad chief: Israeli strike on Iran could 'affect us for 100 years'

Former Mossad Chief Ephraim Halevy told Time magazine in an interview published Thursday that an Israeli attack on Iran "could have an impact on us for the next 100 years" and should only be considered as a last resort.

Halevy, who currently heads the Center for Strategic and Policy Studies at Hebrew University in Jerusalem, added that an Iranian attack on Israel would probably have little impact, because Iranian missiles would largely be intercepted by Israel's advanced anti-missile defense system.

Another former senior Mossad official, who reportedly served during Prime Minister Ehud Olmert's administration, told the American magazine that "Iran's achievement is creating an image of itself as a scary superpower when it's really a paper tiger."…

However, the magazine quoted intelligence sources as saying that an Israeli attack on Iran would likely stall the Islamic republic's nuclear aspirations only by "a year or two."

Launching a long-range strike against a multitude of hidden targets in Iran entails huge risks and uncertain rewards, which makes the cost-benefit analysis weigh against an air strike on Iran, according to some senior Israeli officials who urge caution.

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1005910.html
Last update - July 26, 2008
Report: Ex-Mossad chief says strike on Iran could 'affect us for 100 years'
By Haaretz Service

"Israel is strong. I don't see anyone who could pose an existential threat."

"I don't buy the relevance of comparing the situation with that of Europe in 1938. Then, the hope for a normal Jew looking into the future was to flee. We are not in such a situation. We can defend ourselves against any kind of threat. I don't think we are on the brink of a new Holocaust."

- Israel Defense Minister Ehud Barak

Iran "is radical, but radical does not mean irrational. They want to change the world, not commit suicide."

- Uzi Rubin, Israeli defense consultant who ran Israel's missile shield program in the 1990s, hinting at Israel's ability to retaliate against an Iranian nuclear attack with numerousnuclear weapons launched from Israeli submarines, intermediate-range missiles and fighter bombers.

Myth: If Obama denies Israel the option of attacking Iran, it would weaken Israel's security.

“If the Obama administration were to shift toward learning to live with a nuclear Iran and attempt to deny Israel the painful option of attacking its nuclear targets as a last resort, that would…weaken the security of the Jewish state.”
-Alan Dershowitz, Has Obama Turned on Israel?, Wall Street Journal

An attack on Iran “could have grave consequences and would be very destabilizing.”
-Admiral Mike Mullen, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

“The consequences of” an attack on Iran “are completely unpredictable, and likely [to be] very bad.”
-U.S. Secretary of Defense Robert Gates

President Obama on Iran, June 23, 2009

President Obama’s Opening Remarks On Iran, June 23, 2009

First, I'd like to say a few words about the situation in Iran. The United States and the international community have been appalled and outraged by the threats, the beatings, and imprisonments of the last few days. I strongly condemn these unjust actions, and I join with the American people in mourning each and every innocent life that is lost.

I've made it clear that the United States respects the sovereignty of the Islamic Republic of Iran, and is not interfering with Iran's affairs. But we must also bear witness to the courage and the dignity of the Iranian people, and to a remarkable opening within Iranian society. And we deplore the violence against innocent civilians anywhere that it takes place.

…The Iranian people can speak for themselves. That's precisely what's happened in the last few days. In 2009, no iron fist is strong enough to shut off the world from bearing witness to peaceful protests [sic] of justice. Despite the Iranian government's efforts to expel journalists and isolate itself, powerful images and poignant words have made their way to us through cell phones and computers, and so we've watched what the Iranian people are doing.

This is what we've witnessed. We've seen the timeless dignity of tens of thousands of Iranians marching in silence. We've seen people of all ages risk everything to insist that their votes are counted and that their voices are heard. Above all, we've seen courageous women stand up to the brutality and threats, and we've experienced the searing image of a woman bleeding to death on the streets. While this loss is raw and extraordinarily painful, we also know this: Those who stand up for justice are always on the right side of history.

As I said in Cairo, suppressing ideas never succeeds in making them go away. The Iranian people have a universal right to assembly and free speech. If the Iranian government seeks the respect of the international community, it must respect those rights and heed the will of its own people. It must govern through consent and not coercion. That's what Iran's own people are calling for, and the Iranian people will ultimately judge the actions of their own government.

Say No To War With Iran

Saturday, July 26, 2008

Ex-Mossad chief: Israeli strike on Iran could 'affect us for 100 years'

Visit our Obama Smear Busters site - co-sponsored with J Street

Visit our other site

Support the Jewish Alliance for Change Campaign for Diplomacy Not Preemptive War with Iran

Israel Defense Minister Ehud Barak

"Israel is strong. I don't see anyone who could pose an existential threat."

Major-General Aharon Zeevi-Farkash, Israel's former chief of Military Intelligence

Secretary of Defense Robert Gates & Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Mike Mullen

Myth: If Obama denies Israel the option of attacking Iran, it would weaken Israel's security.

Blog Archive

Top Posts

About Me

Labels

Blog List

President Obama on Iran, June 23, 2009

End Violence Against Peaceful Protests in Iran!